Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_12.mat
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CAGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAUAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.35, deficit  0.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GCGUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -9.29, deficit  6.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUCU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.26, deficit  1.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGUAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.36, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GCAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -8.40, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAUCC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.45, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CCUAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.28, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UCCUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -7.34, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.16, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
AGCGU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.84, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.47, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -7.76, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
AUCUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.90, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GCAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
UCCAA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -4.05, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CCGUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -8.75, deficit  5.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
AAGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.06, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CAUCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.32, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
ACGACU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.95, deficit  0.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUCGUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.09, deficit -0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -5.40, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.04, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CCAAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.49, deficit  0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GGCUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UGAGGA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -6.42, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
UUUUUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -6.04, deficit  1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAGAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.72, deficit  0.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GCAAAC 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.45, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUAG 1  Matches 37; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -4.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUAACC 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.71, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUUGUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -5.55, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.55, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAGAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGCAGC 1  Matches 22; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.03, deficit  5.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.28, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.88, deficit -0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
AGCGAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.44, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
AUUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.03, deficit -0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.13, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CAGGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.07, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUCCCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.00, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGUGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.13, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGUAGG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGCGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.69, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.44, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UCAGUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.98, deficit  1.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUGCUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.72, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GGAGAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGUAAG 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.69, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGGAGC 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.98, deficit  6.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.43, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGAAGA 1  Matches 25; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.31, deficit  4.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.02, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGGAG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.59, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAAGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -6.16, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.45, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35                             
GGAUAC 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGGCAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_57204.1,  5 NTs,                UGGAAA,score      -5.59, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
CGCAAG 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -3.36, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
ACCCUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -6.30, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GGAGAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGACGC 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.14, deficit  7.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAAAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -6.93, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CCAAAG 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.62, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UUUUUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -6.04, deficit  1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCGUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.09, deficit -0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GCGUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.52, deficit  0.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
UUGUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -5.14, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.17, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGGAAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.36, deficit  2.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CCAAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.62, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CGCAAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CAGCAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.86, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUAGGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -8.17, deficit  4.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GGUGCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.98, deficit  0.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CGGAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.05, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGUCCAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -7.38, deficit  1.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GCCGACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -8.48, deficit  5.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CUGAGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.64, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CUGUGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -7.58, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAAAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.77, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GUUUGUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -6.27, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
CAAGUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUUAUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -5.83, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGCUUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.90, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
AUCUUUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.35, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GGUAAAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.11, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CAGAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.67, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGUUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -10.55, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CUUUUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -4.65, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
UGCGAGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score     -10.62, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GUCUUCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.77, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
GUGAGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.70, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GAAAAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.50, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GUUUUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -4.72, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.26, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GGUCCGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -9.91, deficit  7.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGAGGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.77, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGUCAGA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.90, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UAAAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_77081.1,  5 NTs,               UGAAAAG,score      -4.88, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35             
CGACAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -8.12, deficit  2.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CGUUAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.27, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
AAAGAGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.19, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CGUCAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.15, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AUGUCCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.79, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
UGUACGA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.93, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
UUCAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.17, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GCUCUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.03, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAACAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
ACUUUCU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.30, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CGCAAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUGGACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -8.12, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GGAGUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score     -10.38, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGGAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -9.17, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGUCGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.80, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGACAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -8.12, deficit  2.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
AGCCUGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.99, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CGAAAGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GGUGGCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -8.14, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAACGGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.86, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GUCCAUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.22, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CCCGAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -8.68, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUUCGCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.56, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GUGCAGUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -12.90, deficit  5.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
CUGCCAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.88, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUUGUUCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.01, deficit  3.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAAGAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.10, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUAAUAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -6.05, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGACCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score     -10.65, deficit  6.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CUCAGACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.25, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
UGGCUAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -10.38, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GGAAAAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
AGAAAAAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.02, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGAACAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -8.61, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AGGUACGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.63, deficit  2.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CUUGGACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -7.96, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CAGGUACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.57, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
AAAGAUCU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.67, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CAGCGUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score      -9.57, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CGCGGCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.71, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GGUCCAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -8.76, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGAGAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GGCAGAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.46, deficit  0.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AAUUACAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -9.17, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GGUUCUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -4.79, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CUAAGAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -8.99, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCUCGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.27, deficit  2.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CCCUAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -9.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
GGAGAGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.76, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGUAGCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -7.27, deficit  1.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUCGAGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.40, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GGAAUAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.09, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUACCCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.56, deficit  4.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUCCGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.82, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GUUCAAUC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score     -10.39, deficit  5.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
UAAGUUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.36, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
UGGCAAAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -6.53, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
UGCGUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score     -11.12, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AAUUCAAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GGAUUGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -12.83, deficit  7.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GUGAAGUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.21, deficit  2.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
AUUUUCCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.57, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
CUGAAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.46, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GCCGAUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -10.56, deficit  3.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CAAGUUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -7.21, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CUUUUCUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -9.14, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CUUCCUCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.25, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CUGGGACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.56, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUUAAAACC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.81, deficit  0.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGAUAUCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.83, deficit  2.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AAAAUGCCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.70, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
UCUCUUUCA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.99, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGUGUUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -11.15, deficit  7.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
CAAGAAUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -11.19, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAGGCUCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score      -9.16, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
CGGGAUGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -8.91, deficit  3.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCUCGCUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.87, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
UGUGAGCGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -12.54, deficit  6.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
UUGAAACUG 1  Matches  6; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score     -12.77, deficit  9.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CUCGUCACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -7.53, deficit  1.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
AAUCUACGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -12.53, deficit  8.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GAAAGGGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.56, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
UCCGAGGAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -8.82, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CACCUCUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -8.71, deficit  3.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CCGUUGAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score     -10.19, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CCUUGCAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score      -8.46, deficit  4.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAUUUUGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -9.98, deficit  4.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUCGAAUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.87, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CAACCUUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.99, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CACACGUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
UCUGGAAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -6.64, deficit  0.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
UUUGAAAUA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score     -10.86, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
GGACGAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.35, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCUGCGCCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.59, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGGCAAGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.69, deficit  2.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUAUUUCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.86, deficit  7.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUAAAUACU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.36, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGUUAAGGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.31, deficit  2.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CGUGUGGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score     -10.57, deficit  4.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCUGUUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.68, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CUGGCCAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UAACAAUAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.99, deficit  4.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UCUCAUAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score      -5.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
CUAGUCGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.36, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
GGGCAGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.16, deficit  0.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGCCUCAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -10.27, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GUCACAUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.87, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
UGAGAGUAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -11.17, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUGAAGAUU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.04, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CAUAACUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -6.33, deficit  1.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGGUCACGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -11.59, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCUUUCAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -5.62, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
UAAAACUGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -10.28, deficit  4.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CACGUCUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -12.89, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GUUUGAUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -6.77, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GGCGUCGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -12.96, deficit  4.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CUGCCCACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.14, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
GUAGUGUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -10.54, deficit  4.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
CGCAAAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -10.04, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGCCAAUGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.84, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAGAAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -9.17, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CUCAUGUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -12.72, deficit  8.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CGUUAAACGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.85, deficit  0.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCCGACUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.74, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CGCUUGAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -16.04, deficit  7.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
GGUUCACCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.46, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
GUGACGGAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.38, deficit  6.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGAUCGAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.30, deficit  8.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GUCGAUUAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -9.91, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
GUCAGCACUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -10.18, deficit  2.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
GCUACUCAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -8.10, deficit  3.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GUGCUCGGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.66, deficit  4.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
UCAAAAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -11.77, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGGAUUUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -11.46, deficit  6.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CGAAUUUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.21, deficit  4.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUCAGUAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -8.30, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
CGGUCUCAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.87, deficit  5.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAAUGUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -11.86, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CUCUUCGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.55, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
AGGAGAGGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.13, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGAAACCCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.11, deficit  6.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.35, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGGUGUCGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -12.48, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.46, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GUAAAAUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.73, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGCGAUCCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.77, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GGAAAUCGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -12.01, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGGCGUCCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -10.90, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.92, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGCAACUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.48, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUACUGAGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score      -8.20, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CUCUUCCAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -12.56, deficit  6.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
CUAACUAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -7.05, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
UGCUUGGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.62, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCGUUGAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score     -11.66, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
UUUUGAAUUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -10.00, deficit  5.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
CGAAACCAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -10.47, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AGUAUAAAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.41, deficit  6.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GAGUAUUGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -13.58, deficit  8.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CGGCACCUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.57, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GAGAUAGUAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.90, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CGUAAUCCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.70, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCUCUAACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.29, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
UGGUAGAGAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.32, deficit  3.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUCGUAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.43, deficit  6.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
UUAGAGGCCA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.39, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAAGAAAAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.92, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CGCGCUCGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.70, deficit  3.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.23, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CUGCGAAAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.46, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCCGAAUCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.32, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CACGGAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score      -7.89, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCAAUACAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.86, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUACUACGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -14.39, deficit  9.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CACUUCUUUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -12.15, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
UGAGCAGGGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -10.98, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
GAGAAUGGUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -11.90, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
UAUACCUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -13.26, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GUGCUAAUGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -12.75, deficit  8.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CAGUGAACAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.82, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAUGGGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -11.02, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.88, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CUGCAAGAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -13.35, deficit  7.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
AGACAUUCGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -14.46, deficit  6.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CAAACCGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.23, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
UUUACGACGUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -15.87, deficit  6.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUGAAAGCAUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.18, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CAAAGUGCGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -14.31, deficit  7.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUAUGAUAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -10.41, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
AUUCAUUGCCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.64, deficit  6.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.37, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GGACAGGCGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -12.62, deficit  3.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.63, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
UUAGAAUAACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -17.28, deficit  9.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAAUAGAAAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -12.57, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GUAUUGAGUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.72, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.28, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUUUAUAGUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -14.26, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CAAAGCAGGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -11.63, deficit  7.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.44, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUCUAAUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.15, deficit  5.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUUGAGUACCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -14.62, deficit  6.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CAUGGAGUUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -12.26, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
UUUUCGAUGUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -15.28, deficit  6.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCUCACACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -11.38, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
UUUGACAAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.30, deficit  8.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUAAGUGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.35, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.40, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GGAAACCCGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.97, deficit  6.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.11, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUACCACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.53, deficit  8.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CUCAAAGAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -14.45, deficit  8.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CAUCCAAGACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_10751.2,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -14.07, deficit  8.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33                   
ACACGAUCGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.66, deficit  7.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUUAACAAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -9.45, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UGAUCUCGUUGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.97, deficit  8.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGAAACAUUCAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.42, deficit  4.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUGUGAUAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.12, deficit  7.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CGAAACUUAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -15.54, deficit  7.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCAAGAAAAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -11.93, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.30, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUAAUAGCAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.39, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GGAAUUCCAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.71, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUCGGGGUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.60, deficit  5.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
UAGUCUUUUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94032.1, 10 NTs,          UAGUCUCUUUCG,score     -11.62, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAUAAAUAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.04, deficit  6.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAGGUCAUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.20, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUUAGAUGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20714.1, 11 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -15.22, deficit  6.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.47, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGCGAAGUCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.69, deficit  6.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.67, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
UUAUUCAGAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -12.61, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.40, ed 99, 5 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGAUAGCACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.36, deficit  6.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.43, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUAGAUUAGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -16.42, deficit  7.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
UGUAUCUAGAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.52, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCUGUUAGAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -11.68, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.52, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CGCAGAGUAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -20.47, deficit  9.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
CUCCUGGUUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -15.80, deficit  7.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GGACGGUUUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -13.63, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CGAUGGCGGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.69, deficit  7.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.28, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CUUUCGAGAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -18.15, deficit 10.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CAUCCGACAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -14.02, deficit  7.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
GGUUGUGAAAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.72, deficit  7.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
GUUCAAAUUAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -12.59, deficit  6.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
CGUUCUUAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.98, deficit  8.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CAAUGUAUUUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -14.45, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
GGAUUGCGUUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68863.1, 11 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -13.85, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.08, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F   
GGAGAAUGUGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.97, deficit  7.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.11, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCGUAGGUCAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38011.1, 13 NTs,        GCUUAGAAGCAGCC,score     -14.56, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.04, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAGCUUACAAUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -13.41, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.37, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUAGAAACACAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.21, deficit  6.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.19, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCUAAAAUAGCCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -17.93, deficit  9.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
UUUGUCAAAUCCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.82, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGGAGACCAAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.1, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -16.85, deficit  9.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55
CCUUCUAGAGAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -14.90, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.52, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CAAACGGCAAUGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92488.1, 14 NTs,      GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC,score     -16.20, deficit  4.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.61, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35
GAACGAAAGAUUGGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_82866.1, 17 NTs,     CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG,score     -16.66, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.73, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35
4	100.0000	 86.3333	 79.1667	4
5	100.0000	 88.8333	 50.1667	23
6	100.0000	 86.8333	 50.8333	60
7	 99.5000	 53.3333	 15.5000	51
8	 99.5000	 28.3333	  4.1667	46
9	 98.5000	 18.0000	  1.6667	68
10	 95.1667	  7.0000	  0.1667	41
11	 82.1667	  3.3333	  0.0000	42
12	 43.6667	  0.5000	  0.0000	23
13	 17.5000	  0.5000	  0.0000	12
14	  5.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.1667	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.8333	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.8333	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  64 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  91 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  97 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 216 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 225 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 242 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 245 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 246 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 249 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 258 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 263 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 270 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 287 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 289 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 291 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 304 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 304 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 308 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 319 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 328 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 340 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 349 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 350 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 350 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 377 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 379 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 404 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 404 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 407 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 411 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 424 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 430 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 431 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 435 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 449 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 462 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 463 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 467 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 531 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 548 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 553 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 603 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 620 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 621 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 627 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 644 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 648 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 653 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 659 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 662 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 667 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 881 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 887 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 986 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.2569%
Number of models giving false positives is 301 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.40
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.54
